Okay, there are many more serious issues than whatever Hillary's nightmare outfit du jour is, but she really outdid herself with the screamingly hideous ensemble she recently wore to a liberal fundraising event hosted by Cher.
Speculation has run rampant on what the heck her garment even is: a grill cover? Oven mitt? Hospital scrubs designed by Jackson Pollock? The EEG readouts of her brainwaves while having a seizure? Nobody really knows. But one thing is known: the hideous garment was expensive - said to be costing over $12,000. Which doesn't really suggest that Clinton is the very best person we could have making economic decisions for the nation.
Seriously, Hillary's jacket looks as if it were specifically designed for people who plan to shoplift hams, or perhaps want to conceal a colostomy bag and a flak jacket. Which, in fairness, isn't a bad idea considering that Hillary is a target for Bosnian snipers when and where they're least expected.
What was expected at the event actually happened: lots of money changing hands (presumably from those too busy to actually schedule a meeting at the Clinton Foundation) and unsubtle political rhetoric.
Cher, whose last hit (recorded on cylinder by Thomas Edison) was, appropriately enough, "Gypsies, Tramps, and Thieves," regaled her wealthy cronies with the trenchant insight that Donald Trump is a Nazi. An idea which Hillary Clinton disagrees with to the extent that her most recent campaign commercial suggests he's a Nazi and a member of the Ku Klux Klan.
Accusations even less subtle and more ugly than Hillary's fashion sense. And that's no small accomplishment.
 |
| A reminder that it wasn't all bad being Helen Keller. |
AAAAAGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!! That last pic of Cher was completely uncalled for!
ReplyDeleteHillary's outfit(?) Looks like a giant designer lampshade. If she kept a night-light under there it would complete the ensemble.
At least her pants cuff are above her fat ankles so she will not trip over them or maybe she is planning on having a fund raiser in Baton Rouge and does not want her pant legs wet. However, for twelve thousand bucks, you would think Omar Mohammad the tent maker would have color coordinated the tent and pants. Maybe he made the tent and got the pants from Goodwill. Ya never know.
ReplyDelete@ Jim Irre: Cher really didn't need to put that picture out! yes, she has kept moderately good looks across the years (eons?) however, the years DO add up! kinda makes you wonder what the bill for all of that "rejuvenation" adds up to.
ReplyDeleteStilton, my man! you fail not to amuse! I look forward to these cartoons as I know they will be funny AND relevant. there might be others out there , but I haven't seen relevant and funny AND political cartoons since I was learning to read and found the cartoon strip called POGO. actually, I learned to read earlier. by the time I was 5 I was reading Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew books
Semi-literate, talentless, plasticized purveyors of poop culture. Yep, that's who I want picking my President.
ReplyDeleteAnd just to pour lemon juice on a cut (figuratively speaking) both of those (ahem) ladies were unable to not have their husbands seeking oral gratification elsewhere. But I digress. I think that both their outfits were designed by Attila The Hun's dressmaker.
ReplyDeleteI didn't catch to what he was referring specifically, but appreciated Ben Carson's observation that what we were hearing/seeing from Hillary is "desperation".
ReplyDeleteAnd $12G for that outfit. Really? Whoever funded that has to be pissed. It looks like they set it down over her with a hoist. Maybe that's a primer coat.
$12k for an outfit is really nothing when you consider she's pandering to our over-insulated betters in Hollywood but she did not get her money's worth, that's for sure. Hillary! needs to fire her stylist and hire someone who is not visually impaired.
ReplyDeleteEvery day's Casual Friday at the Clinton Foundation.
ReplyDeleteIn this case, I guess you can tell a book by it's cover.
ReplyDeleteSausage by it's casing.
OK, I'll stop there.
@Bobo: I must ask - Who but the visually impaired could stand dressing Hillary?
ReplyDeleteEvery time I see one of her $12K outfits, I can hear someone in the fashion industry laughing. Laughing all the way to the bank. I swear - I'm in the wrong industry! I can't put a neck hole and pockets on a $7 K-Mart tablecloth and turn it around for $12,000! This designer has my respect...
OWWWW that hurt. I only hope I can get those images wiped from the hard drive of my mind. The NSA and fbi are welcome to them if they hack my brain.
ReplyDeleteIt just proves that some people have more money than brains. Yech!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteThe costume that Hillary was wearing reminds me of the internet photos posted of Walmart Shoppers.
If Hillary would turn around, would her butt be exposed?
Bill Moore
Where did H->illary! ever get the idea that plaid went with camouflage?
ReplyDeleteHer outfits cost so much because Armani et al charge a premium for the damage she's doing to their corporate image.
And finally, Cher sweetie, when I hire a girl to sing, I expect her to sing, not talk.
Hillary's $12,000 designer hospital gown and scrub pants.
ReplyDeletePerhaps it is camouflage for the storm clouds that are coming when her 15,000 Benghazi e-mails are released next month.
ReplyDeletewhen i first came to this site this morning, the top photo came up then immediately went "blue screen". unfortunately, i refreshed.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this hilarious post - Gawd knows, I needed the laughs.
ReplyDelete$12,000 ???!!!??? I've seen better outfits for ten bucks at Walmart.
Hillary's pathetic excuse for trying to break into the fashion world is now history. I've seen better clothes at the Salvation Army store than the sack she is wearing. As for Cher, her numerous facelifts are wearing thin, and the G-string thingy she is wearing is about as appropriate as if one's grandmother had it strapped on. Good for laughs, Cher, but you're no Harpo Marx...or are you?
ReplyDeleteHer outfit would be perfect for Zippy the Pinhead!
ReplyDeleteIf Screechery's ensemble was khaki green with 'Otisville' printed on it, it would be complete.
ReplyDelete@Bill
ReplyDelete"If Hillary would turn around, would her butt be exposed?"
Probably not, but judging by the break it(she) took during one of the dee-bates I would guess there would be a big brown shart stain.
I had assumed it was something new from Mugatu's "Derelicte" line; a frock hewn of discarded Rand-McNally road atlas maps. At a mere $12,000, I'm sure it was a steal.
ReplyDeleteJust be thankful that she didn't wear something Cher might have, as pictured above.
It's more likely concealing Hillary's new exoskeleton that is required for her to move about independently without the phalanx of Secret Service agents to prop her up.
As for comparing Trump to Nazis and the KKK, you'd think that would open the door for Trump to wittingly respond about the real fascist in the campaign, and the Democrat's history as the party for slavery and against civil rights. But as I've said before, I question Trump's credentials as a real candidate, especially after altering his supposedly signature immigration stance to resemble that of "low energy Jeb".
In the meantime, I'm still suffering from my existential crisis over who to vote for. My default fallback, the Libertarians are busy spouting about carbon trading and gun control, because nothing screams "libertarianism" like a massive government wealth-transfer scheme and tossing the 2nd Amendment.
Oh, a total aside here: Have you been tracking this whole "epipen" scandal? I think it's a trap designed to justify a "single payer" takeover of the healthcare industry.
And one more thing; If Cher has one more facelift she's going to be sporting a goatee.
ReplyDeleteSeems to me the Democrats shouldn't be bandying the term "Hitler" about, especially after getting busted for trying to use Bernie's Jewish heritage as a weapon against him in the DNC machinations to ensure their pre-designated candidate the nomination.
ReplyDeleteBut "common sense" for Democrats isn't really all that common. (Either does "fashion sense", obviously!)
Hey, Dorkbutt: She wore the costume as a joke because of Cher's propensity to wear strange outfits. You're such a tool!!
ReplyDeleteAnd they make fun of Trump's hair?
ReplyDeleteI know what someone wears shouldn't be rellevant, but DAMN!
And the Cher photo makes me wonder if Sonny actually aimed for that tree.
Here's an article showing Hillary sporting this and some other of her Ringling Brother's designer outfits:
ReplyDeletehttp://mobile.wnd.com/2016/08/who-wore-it-better-you-wont-believe-hillarys-new-outfit/
I have to say that even *I* think that outfit is hideous, and I dress in either scrubs or old jeans and a walmart tshirt.
ReplyDeleteI just stole this thank you: So a reporter asked Hillary " American women would like to know if you prefer thong or bikini underwear?"
ReplyDeleteAfter a pause to gather her scattered thoughts she replied "Hmmm, depends"
One nice thing about Hillary is that she somehow manages to make Michelle look stylish!
ReplyDelete@RoseByrd YOU'RE the tool...and probably a troll as well. Hillary has worn similar hideous outfits like this in the past. Pay attention. Go away.
ReplyDeleteHillary's pockets remind me of Captain Kangaroo's. Seems to have them on several of her outfits over the past year or two. As I read somewhere, maybe she needs the pockets to hold Clinton Crime Family Foundation donations.
ReplyDelete"Hillary's pockets remind me of Captain Kangaroo's. Seems to have them on several of her outfits over the past year or two."
ReplyDeleteAnd she needs the outline to find the pockets.
Such big pockets, yet her hands always seem to be in other people's pockets.
ReplyDelete"Hiding a medical appliance" was my first thought. The late wife wore a colostomy bag during her last years and had to drape her shape like that. Flak vest is also likely.
ReplyDelete@Readers- I've got to say I'm delighted by all the responses today's post is generating. I think we were all overdue for a simple laugh. Responding piecemeal to a few comments, I really do think that garment is so big and ugly that she must be using it to hide something underneath. When I joked about a colostomy bag or flak jacket, I was only sorta kinda joking - I don't think either is unlikely.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the bold outlining around the giant pockets, I've also wondered if that was so she could find them easily and not tip others off to some eye-hand coordination issue (have you seen her around falling balloons? Yikes!).
And please, let's all be nice to @RoseByrd. After all, her late husband was a longtime member of the Senate and a high-ranking official in the Ku Klux Klan.
Speaking of: So I catch the evening news where the top story is Donald Trump's doctor's statement about his health. Seems Trump is fine, or so sez his doctor. In the name of "balance", they did mention Hillary, or more specifically, the "Internet rumors" about Hillary's health. But nothing beyond that. 90% of the story was about Trump, or really mostly Trump's doctor.
ReplyDeleteSo here we have two candidates. One clearly appears to be quite healthy for his age, at least beyond his megalomania. The other has been appearing tired, obviously needs help up stairs, and occasionally appears to go into some sort of spasms. And yet all the media seems to be interested in is the first candidate's doctor, and what he might be hiding.
Why isn't anyone chasing down Hillary's doctor(s)?
Just another example of the mainstream media as the wholly owned PR arm of the Democrats.
Wahoo, that's because there's no room in her pockets; they're full of cash.
ReplyDeleteAnd I agree with Stilton; she's hiding something in her costumes, and I don't think it's body armor.
I was thinking that I had seen pics of high cuff pants before and the light bulb went off: Old pics of hillbillies. Big pockets for acorn cob pipe, sack tobacco and a chaw.
ReplyDelete@rickn8or: I suspect she is the Ghost of Christmas Present and she's hiding those two kooky kids: Ignorance and Want. Except that, under the guiding hand of the Progressives, those two have become obese behemoths, so she needs that circus-tent of a gown to keep them properly concealed...
ReplyDelete(My apologies to Charles Dickens.)
Y'all fail to see the practicality of the Hildebeast's attire: If somebody pukes on her (as many will do when seeing that suit), it won't show!
ReplyDeleteHer jacket outfits probably have pockets on inside to keep cash "donations" to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation. Reminds me of a great-aunt who ran a whorehouse in Louisville and constantly wore a large house-robe with inner pockets to hold half-pints of whiskey she was bootlegging.
ReplyDelete$12,000 for that outfit?
ReplyDeleteAnd the media went bonkers when Palin got her daughter a better outfit for $10,000?
MSM - "We are unfair hypocrites and you can't prove it to our face without a hammer."
I bet Hillary will make all women who have better bodies than she does wear one of the oven mitt thingys. It might even replace the burka! Just have to be careful not to shoot the wife.
ReplyDeleteGumbeaux
She just keeps getting more obnoxious/pathetic as she goes along...........can't people see through her???.........I just don't get it - "First woman president???" - God help us all!!!
ReplyDelete