Barack Obama has ordered a "full review" of cyber-chicanery associated with the 2016 elections, under the belief that Russia may have tampered with our sacred voting process by somehow having created a 30 year history of corruption by Hillary Clinton and everyone she's ever been in contact with.
Where do we even begin? The CIA - no doubt under orders and perhaps the threat of waterboarding - has issued a strong but factually vague statement that people who may have connections to people who may be Russian may have provided Wikileaks with vast amounts of hacked information about Hillary's decades-long history of sleazy deals and ineptitude, which may have influenced the election because (unlike most information given to voters) it was all true.
The accusations would be more plausible if the CIA, FBI, and DOJ weren't so thoroughly compromised by their own political cover-ups and scandals at this point. As their main mission is now the protection of undeserving Democratic asses, we're not exactly impressed with anything they're saying now.
And just how "meta" is the accusation that Russia tried to corrupt our election process by releasing proof (and plenty of it) that Hillary and the DNC had already corrupted the election process? Who's the actual criminal here, and who's simply a witness?
Hope n' Change actually thinks it pretty unlikely that Russia had anything to do with the release of damning information about Hillary and her cohorts in crime. After all, if they had hacked all this dirt (not to mention every Top Secret hosted on her email server) wouldn't they want Hillary to win so that they'd own an American President because of all the blackmail potential?
That's why we think it far more likely that the source of the hacked material was an individual patriot from the Democratic party or a domestic intelligence agency who saw this as the only way to save America from a corrupt, shrieking, money-grubbing, two-faced, brain-damaged harpy with a gift for screwing up every policy issue she's ever touched.
Obama's highly publicized demand for a report on computer espionage is supposed to be rushed to his Oval Office desk (no doubt to be left between his fingernail clippings and scuff marks from the heels of his shoes), but the results may never be made public. Which is hardly surprising, considering that the actual purpose of Obama's call for an investigation is simply to delegitimize the upcoming Presidency of Donald Trump.
In other words, a hostile government really is trying to subvert the will of American voters. It just happens to be the government currently in Washington.
Third from last paragraph sounds about right.
ReplyDeleteSpot on, Stilt! From a friend of Magoo...
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, it boils down to the libs being in total denial that they LOST! All their sneaky little tricks from now on are meaningless. They need to get a reality check. And when are the losers who said they were leaving the country, if Trump won, getting the h out?
ReplyDeleteAnd in the strip, o'bammy's actually trying to look serious .... methinks he's about 8 years too late.
ReplyDeleteMethinks that if Russia truly was involved they would have much more efficiently hidden their tracks. This smells of false flag to me.
ReplyDeleteThe only story that I've seen is that the Russians are the ones that hacked the DNC and Podesta's email accounts and then gave them to wikileaks so that they could be published, thus hoping to influence millions of people all over the country to vote for Trump.
ReplyDeleteHas anyone claimed that the Russians sent over millions of secret agents to personally cast millions of votes for Trump? No.
Has anyone claimed that the Russians hacked the voting computers so that R votes would be changed to D votes? No.
Has any one claimed that the Russians sent agents to buy millions of votes with free stuff? No.
Has anyone claimed that the Russians coerced the vote counters to under count Trump's votes and/or over count Hillary's votes? No.
Has anyone claimed that the Russians managed to stuff the ballot boxes with millions of fake ballots? No.
Has anyone claimed that the Russian secret agents all maneuvered themselves into positions as poll watchers so they could steal ballots for Trump or otherwise impede lawful voters that might vote for Trump? No.
This is stealing an election?
BINGO!
ReplyDelete@Popular Front- I always try to write at least one good paragraph (grin).
ReplyDelete@Trevor Vietor- Any friend of Magoo's is a friend of mine! Glad to have you here!
@Judi King- I don't think we're going to see many celebs leaving the country, because they were previously using a rhetorical device called "lying." Darn it.
@Fred Ciampi- I'm not quite sure what emotion Barry is displaying in the picture, although it may well be his attempt at seriousness. Looks more like "annoyed indifference" to me.
@Geoff King- Ambassador John Bolton has also raised the possibility of a false flag here, which I find likely.
@Boligat- Great points throughout. I'll just add that even though I've seen the stories that Russia is behind the hacking, I've seen not one story giving proof of this assertion. In fact, if there was proof, then why would Obama be making this loud demand for a new investigation?
@Rod- Yahtzee!
Strange...for some reason I read the question in the last panel as what would it take to get Øbama to pull his head out of a particular part of his anatomy.
ReplyDeleteForget the Russians, I read where the "new" leaders of the democrats are going to be"
ReplyDeleteThe Same Old Leaders!!!! Pilosi, Biden and the Muslim!!! If that isn't good news, there is none. They are suppose to entice and win over the younger people. That'll work. Young folks (with minds full of mush) love to follow the footsteps of grandma and grandpa and a bigot. I tell you now, if these nitwits did not have giant egos we would be in trouble as we cannot compete with free stuff.
BTW: I have been thinking on the prosecution of the crooked Clinton and I think I figured out PE Trump: The Sword of Damocles. When you factor that in it makes perfect sense what he is doing.
A serplative job Stilt.
ReplyDelete@James D You have me confused now, to which Muslim do you refer?
O'Baja said he was sticking around./sarc
Odd how suddenly he cares who is influencing other's elections.
ReplyDeleteBarry had NO qualms about actively working against Nhetenahu (sp, I know) or Brexit..
Hey, Dumbass, You STARTED it!!!!
Funny how they want us to think the Russkies hacked everything in sight EXCEPT Hillary's server!
ReplyDeleteHow about a nice cartoon with Hillary and "The Color Purple"? I guess purple is the new orange.
As far as I know no one is claiming the emails are fraudulent. They're just screeching 'cause they got caught. Typical criminal, or worse, behavior. But then we knew that already, that's why so many voted against Hillary in the first place, in spite of Trump's faults.
ReplyDelete@Pete: It all started when he hit me back.
ReplyDeleteYou know, there was a time when Democrats were more than happy to have Russian help in manipulating our elections.
ReplyDeleteSo now, the same people who less than 5 years ago were mocking Mitt Romney's concern about a re-emerging Russian menace are now arguing that under Obama's last term, Russia has now in fact re-emerged as a cold war nemesis.
And as for spin, somehow Russia releasing Hillary and the DNC's dirty laundry somehow makes Hillary less corrupt? Really?
Personally, I agree with @Stilton: As we've long known even before the supposed Russian hack, as Secretary of State, Hillary was more than happy to serve Russian interests in quid-quo-pro fashion. If the Russians had obtained the information in question, it's hard to imagine being in a better position than not only having a President willing to deal for a price, but having the leverage to negotiate for even lower prices. Talk about "manipulation".
Amidst all this insanity, is the emerging Democratic meme about the consequences of "fake news". That's right! The people who propagated lies like "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it" and "the Benghazi attack was inspired by a YouTube video" are warning people who used to get their information from "The Daily Show" and Stephen Colbert that the country is being influenced by "fake news". You can't make this insanity up. The Onion is becoming irrelevant; if I was one of their writers, I'd be passing my resume around the alphabets about now.
None of this passes any rational logic or smell test. But the agenda of the left hasn't for quite some time now.
Is there a word or term for mass insanity within a particular group? It seems that's what we have here. If not directly insane; insane to think we don't have election cause & effect... and we see though all the denial and bullshit. This IS Barry's legacy.
ReplyDelete@OpenTheDoor, he's no doubt referring to frontrunning candidate for leadership of the DNC, Keith Ellison, congress's first Muslim. Mr. Ellison has well documented ties to the likes of Louis Farrakhan, the Muslim Brotherhood and other interesting characters who are openly at war with America.
ReplyDeleteIn the name of open-mindedness and "diversity", I hope the Democrats elect him. So while the left takes cheap shots at Steve Bannon for allegations of being an anti-Semite or question any Christian for what their preachers might think regarding homosexuality, they will have elected an actual anti-Semite and gay hater to run the party.
It will be fun watching the depths of rhetorical insanity the Democrats will have to indulge in to square that circle while more and more of the "rank and file" come to the same conclusion the rest of us long have; that the Democrat Party today exists for the benefit of political elites, and has contempt for everyone else.
@John the Econ, "The Great One" has established that Ellison's official muslim name is "Keith X".
ReplyDeleteI'd have a question for lamont... "when I accurately call you an "arrogant bastard" is it the word "arrogant" or "bastard" that puts me on the IRS "hit list", (follow up question, "is it true that your favorite playing card is the 'Douche of Spades'?")
ReplyDelete