Friday, June 25, 2010

Penetrating Remark


Because we can go to Hell in a Handbasket even faster if we give the handbasket supersonic jet engines, a Massachusetts school system has decided to distribute free condoms to children as young as six years old...with parents unable to voice complaints or prevent the distribution.

Children - as young as kindergarten students - can request the condoms secretly, but will only receive them after a consultation with a school nurse who can
make sure that the condoms will be used appropriately. Which presumably means that a six-year-old boy can only have consensual sex with a five-year-old girl (perhaps requiring a promise to give her a shiny nickel.)

As much as we'd like to have a devastatingly clever punchline to this story, it just isn't going to happen.
Hope n' Change is literally, truly, physically ill about this.

And so we simply leave you with a photo of the children - the
children, for God's sake - that the Massachusetts school system thinks should be having unrestricted sex whether their parents are against it or not.

Look at these kids' eyes, their faces, and their
smiles. Think about their lives, their hopes, and their futures. And then ask yourself why a taxpayer-funded school system would deliberately be prepping them all to be rape victims.

To paraphrase Hillary Clinton and her ghostwriter, "It takes a village...
to destroy families."




18 comments:

Anonymous said...

If we ever needed to pray for our country, it is now. Jesus said it best in Luke 17:1 - 2: "Things that cause people to sin are bound to come, but woe to that person through whom they come. It would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around his neck than for him to cause one of these to sin. So watch yourselves." I hate to think of the judgement coming upon this once-great nation for allowing Obama and his ilk free reign to corrupt and destroy its people.

Pete(Detroit) said...

Wrong
Just plain effing WRONG.
I was of two minds about the kids (13, 14) being both charged w/ Statutory - heck, in 8th grade *I* probably would have, if I could have...
But elementary kids? That's just sick. No matter how you slice it.

Anonymous said...

Excuse me for asking, but are they packaged in child sizes? This is sick.

Suzy said...

While we're boycotting states, here.....

Stilton Jarlsberg said...

Anonymous (Second)- We're not sure about the size issue, and probably can't even Google for an answer without being put on a watch list for perverts.

However, we recently read that some school systems (for older kids) added "extra-large" condoms to their inventory, and these immediately became the ones the guys wanted - mostly for bragging rights. Unfortunately, since they don't really fit the overly optimistic lads, they tend to fall off...thereby increasing the risks of pregnancy and disease.

pryorguy said...

in ref to the first post by anonymous...At any given moment in time, there are those who would like to make stuff like this the norm, thank God we have had leaders up till now that had the soul to stand it their way...but youre right, since Obama is here, political correctness, globalism, political expediency, and all that self-serving crap is the order of the day...Id like to say tho, a better day is coming, though it aint near...there are too many good people in this country for this to go on, altho it may seem like they are getting the upper hand, just wait, pray, vote, inform each other, and we'll see their destructive ideas go up in smoke!

Im from Oklahoma, and today I see we're passing a bill to keep judges from EVER using sharia law in our courtrooms. Who would have thought we would need to deal with something like that?I think thats pretty forward thinking of our lawmakers. Hopefully others around this great land will have the cajones to approach these issues.

Stilton Jarlsberg said...

pryorguy- We wonder how long it will take Obama to put Eric Holder on the job of suing Oklahoma over the "no shariah law" bill if it passes. And hopefully, it will...though as you say, it's weird that states even have to be passing laws against such nuttiness these days.

And just to tie this back to the original thread, let's not forget that Mohammed's "favorite wife," Ayesha, was just 6 years old.

Dr.D said...

Where are the descendants of the Puritans these days? Why don't they start burning these people at the stake? Looks like a significan renewable energy source, at least as long as the "progressives" (Liberals) continue in their wicked ways.

Emmentaler Limburger said...

Dr. D: they can't burn them at the stake. They can't afford the Carbon Waivers...

Colby Muenster said...

What's scary to me? Not only are these lawmakers unaware that this is totally, completely, and morally WRONG; they actually think they are doing the right thing! What the hell happened to "parents?" I guess they don't exist anymore (leastways, not in Massa-chewshits).

This is wrong on so many levels. A six year old can't get pregnant, so that means the lawmakers want to prevent the spread of STD's. Where the heck do they think a six year old is going to contract an STD? It brings to mind the groups who advocate boy/man sex.

Disgusting.....

alan markus said...

Did anyone else notice the name of the school?

Veterans Memorial Elementary School

Think about that - I'm not so sure this was the kind of freedom that our finest sacrificed their lives for! I'm not a veteran (my father & grandfather were), but man, if any veterans groups demand that this school change it's name, I'm with them 110%

Stilton Jarlsberg said...

alan- They may not have to change the name of the school. According to news reports just now coming out, for some reason the school is now reconsidering their "Kinder-Kondom" program.

It's amazing how quickly slimy things can try to crawl out of the searing light when you lift their rock...

Emmentaler Limburger said...

Alan, names mean nothing to these people - only their agenda. Just watch what's going on in Washington. These ideologues have little or no concern over their reelection prospects. It's damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead (and, if they happen to twist up the constitution, execute some crafty redistricting, and a few other things along the way to improve their chance of reelection - well, that's just gravy).

This, I think, is one of the primary differences between conservatives and mainstream liberals: they're so bent on achieving their objectives that they become almost (I said ALMOST) selfless in their approach to achieving it, and blind to any impropriety and/or negative effects.

Suzy said...

Dr. D, according to the latest study in Britain, its okay to kill somebody (in their study, it was preborn babies earlier than 24 weeks) if they do not feel pain.

So...drug them up so they can't feel pain...and burn them on the stake...its scientifically legal now, right????

Anonymous said...

Suzy, that's naughty.

Spinelessobama said...

I have a question.

"If she takes the shiny nickel for having sex will she be charged with prostitution??? Will he be charged for solicitation"??? I wonder if this applies to Obama's 2 daughters? Does Obama encourage them to have sex? He might be a "sugar daddy" and he pimps them out to his friends. All of you better be careful of what you say about Obama, he will kick your ass.

pryorguy said...

I'm encouraged by all your posts...this dude will not stand!!!!!

Stilton Jarlsberg said...

Readers- Reading all these comments is the highlight of my Friday evening. You're a great group!